Policy changed — see what exactly · 2026-07-11 →
Poliziadistato.it is the official website of the State Police of Italy. Home-page capture: 150 requests, 14 domains. For a law-enforcement body the set of third-party Google services is heavy: Google Analytics, the DoubleClick advertising domain, a full tracking YouTube embed with video autoplay, Google's tag system and fonts. There is a consent banner on the site, but consent is not given (no cookie set during the session), and Google's consent mode is not engaged at all — the tags work in the ordinary mode. Before consent, Google Analytics sends a view, DoubleClick requests an advertising identifier, and the embedded video plays automatically and for more than 25 seconds sends view telemetry to Google. All of this comes into direct contradiction with the site's own policy, which declares that profiling and other tracking methods are not applied.
Timeline of the leak
Declared versus actual
Detected trackers
- Google Analytics 4
- DoubleClick (Google advertising)
- YouTube (full embed with tracking)
- Google Tag Manager
- Google Fonts
Indicators of GDPR non-compliance
- Art. 6(1)(a) GDPR — analytics, an advertising domain and a tracking video fire before consentThe site has a consent banner, but in a clean session, without any user decision and without a working Google Consent Mode, several Google services fire before consent. Google Analytics sends a page view. The DoubleClick advertising domain requests an advertising identifier and checks the video-advertising status. And the embedded video loads via the full tracking domain youtube.com (rather than via the privacy youtube-nocookie), plays automatically and, over more than 25 seconds, sends detailed playback telemetry to Google — view marks, watch time, player events. There is no Google consent signal (Consent Mode) in the capture at all, that is, the tags work in the ordinary mode rather than in «consent not given» mode. All of this happens before consent, which the site's banner offers to request.
- Art. 13 GDPR — the policy declares «no tracking methods», which directly contradicts the factThe site's policy explicitly asserts that profiling cookies are not used and no other tracking methods are applied, and that analytics is collected in aggregate form. However, in fact the DoubleClick advertising domain works (a request for an advertising identifier — Google's advertising and remarketing infrastructure) and a full tracking YouTube embed, sending minute-by-minute view telemetry. Both are tracking methods, whose presence the document explicitly denies. Meanwhile Google Analytics and YouTube are named in the policy, while DoubleClick is not mentioned at all. Thus the statement «no tracking methods» does not match what the site actually does.
Context
www.poliziadistato.it is the official website of the State Police of Italy. The data controller is the Ministry of the Interior / State Police. This is a law-enforcement body, and the site is informational: news, services for citizens (passports, applications), information about the police’s work. Capture: 150 requests to 14 domains, the home page, taken on a clean Edge browser with no VPN and no blocker. There is a consent banner on the site. The technical stack is noticeably tied to Google services, including an advertising domain and a full tracking video embed.
Who receives the data
Spotted here were: Google, DoubleClick. Google is present through several services: analytics (Google Analytics), tag system (Tag Manager), embedded video (YouTube) and fonts. DoubleClick is Google’s advertising-remarketing domain, which requests an advertising identifier and checks the video-advertising status. The embedded video loads, among other ways, via the full tracking domain youtube.com rather than only via the privacy youtube-nocookie, and plays automatically, sending view telemetry to Google.
Was there a consent banner
Yes, there is a consent banner on the site, it loads at the 105th millisecond. No «accept/decline» decision was made in this visit, and not a single cookie was set during the session — that is, consent is not given. Meanwhile an important detail: there is no Google consent-mode (Consent Mode) signal in the requests at all. This means that Google’s tags work not in «consent not given» mode (as on some other sites in the series, where Google holds back the data), but in the ordinary mode — and simply send data.
What fires before consent
Before any user decision, the following manage to fire:
- Google Analytics — a page-view event;
- the DoubleClick advertising domain — a request for an advertising identifier and a check of the video-advertising status;
- the full tracking YouTube embed — video autoplay with view telemetry sent to Google (marks, watch time at the 5th, 15th, 25th seconds);
- Google’s tag system and Google Fonts. The key point — there is no mitigation here that some other sites had. Google’s consent mode is not engaged, so the tags do not hold back the data. The DoubleClick advertising domain and the tracking video embed are full-fledged tracking, not de-identified statistics.
A direct contradiction with the policy
This is the pivotal point. The site’s policy explicitly states that profiling cookies are not used and no other tracking methods are applied, and that analytics is collected in aggregate form. But in fact both the DoubleClick advertising domain (Google’s advertising and remarketing infrastructure) and the full tracking YouTube embed with minute-by-minute view telemetry work. Both are precisely tracking methods, whose presence the document denies. Google Analytics and YouTube are named in the policy, but DoubleClick is not mentioned at all. That is, the promise «no tracking methods» diverges from what the site actually does.
Conclusion
Poliziadistato.it is one of the more serious cases in the series, and the seriousness is heightened by the fact that this is a law-enforcement body. On the State Police’s site, before consent, Google Analytics, the DoubleClick advertising-remarketing domain and a full tracking YouTube embed fire, which plays the video automatically and for more than 25 seconds sends view telemetry to Google — while Google’s consent mode is not engaged, and the policy itself explicitly denies the use of tracking methods. The main takeaway for the reader: the divergence between the promised and the actual here is not a shade but a direct contradiction — the document says «we do not track», while the wire shows an advertising domain and a tracking video before consent. It would have been enough to switch the video into privacy mode with click-to-play, remove the advertising domain and place the Google tags behind consent — the consent infrastructure is already on the site.
8fdd59b0665199fca3bbba3c30996c381845bc004df0322d6a040afd6e5338c2Where to file: Italian Data Protection Authority (Garante) — garanteprivacy.it
To: Italian Data Protection Authority (Garante) From: [Your name], [contact email] 1. Subject of the complaint I am filing a complaint regarding the processing of my personal data by the website poliziadistato.it. 2. Circumstances I visited the website poliziadistato.it and found indications that the processing of my personal data does not comply with the GDPR. The technical analysis published on gdpru.eu on 15 June 2026 (open methodology, reproducible measurements) documents the following indications: 1) The site has a consent banner, but in a clean session, without any user decision and without a working Google Consent Mode, several Google services fire before consent. Google Analytics sends a page view. The DoubleClick advertising domain requests an advertising identifier and checks the video-advertising status. And the embedded video loads via the full tracking domain youtube.com (rather than via the privacy youtube-nocookie), plays automatically and, over more than 25 seconds, sends detailed playback telemetry to Google — view marks, watch time, player events. There is no Google consent signal (Consent Mode) in the capture at all, that is, the tags work in the ordinary mode rather than in «consent not given» mode. All of this happens before consent, which the site's banner offers to request. 2) The site's policy explicitly asserts that profiling cookies are not used and no other tracking methods are applied, and that analytics is collected in aggregate form. However, in fact the DoubleClick advertising domain works (a request for an advertising identifier — Google's advertising and remarketing infrastructure) and a full tracking YouTube embed, sending minute-by-minute view telemetry. Both are tracking methods, whose presence the document explicitly denies. Meanwhile Google Analytics and YouTube are named in the policy, while DoubleClick is not mentioned at all. Thus the statement «no tracking methods» does not match what the site actually does. Full technical documentation is published at: https://gdpru.eu/en/audits/it-poliziadistato-it/ 3. Provisions violated Art. 6(1)(a) GDPR — analytics, an advertising domain and a tracking video fire before consent; Art. 13 GDPR — the policy declares «no tracking methods», which directly contradicts the fact 4. Request I request that you investigate the violations described and apply the measures provided for in Article 58(2) GDPR. 5. Attachments The full evidence base — the HAR file, its SHA-256 checksum and the quotation from the site's privacy policy documenting the stated contradiction — is published and verifiable at the link in point 2 above. [Date] [Signature / name]