ogcio.gov.ie
Policy changed — see what exactly · 2026-08-26 →
The Office of the Government Chief Information Officer — the body responsible for digital policy across Ireland's entire civil service. 19 requests, 6 domains. GTM fires without consent. A government-run Matomo instance sends a detailed fingerprint without consent. The policy describes anonymous, cookieless tracking — the HAR shows otherwise.
Request timeline
Declared versus actual
Transfer timings
GTM gtag/js G-Y9JG02MH13. USA.
Google Fonts — Lato. USA.
Lato woff2. Google's servers. USA.
Matomo JS tr4ck3rj. A government-run domain.
Matomo POST tr4ck3rp. A browser fingerprint. idsite=92.
Detected trackers
- Google Tag Manager / GA4 (www.googletagmanager.com, G-Y9JG02MH13)
- A government-run Matomo instance (track.analytics.services.gov.ie)
- Google Fonts (fonts.googleapis.com, fonts.gstatic.com)
Indicators of GDPR non-compliance
- GDPR Art. 6(1), Art. 7; ePrivacy Regulations (SI 336/2011)Google Tag Manager (G-Y9JG02MH13) and Google Fonts load at +505–506 ms without consent. The Matomo tracker (track.analytics.services.gov.ie) sends a full fingerprinting request at +588 ms without consent: browser (Chromium 148, Edge 148), platform (Windows 19.0.0), screen resolution (1536x864), a unique identifier _id=d1fd37127747513b, and a visit identifier pv_id=7KN68K. The policy declares cookieless tracking with no PII — yet the request carries a detailed technical fingerprint.
- GDPR Art. 5(1)(a) — transparencyThe policy describes Matomo as a cookieless solution collecting no PII and does not mention Google Tag Manager. GTM (G-Y9JG02MH13) loads in parallel with Matomo without consent. GTM's presence in the HAR is not documented in the policy in any form.
- GDPR Art. 13(1)(e)Google Fonts (fonts.googleapis.com, fonts.gstatic.com) is not mentioned in the policy. GTM and its associated GA4 ID are not mentioned. Three of four external data recipients are undocumented.
Context
The OGCIO (Office of the Government Chief Information Officer) is a division of the Department of Public Expenditure responsible for digital policy and IT infrastructure across Ireland’s entire civil service. It is the OGCIO that runs the gov.ie platform and FormIE. HAR: 19 requests, 6 domains. 13 requests go to assets.per.gov.ie — the government’s CDN for public resources. The remaining 6 go to four external domains.
A government-run Matomo instance and a fingerprint prior to consent
The privacy policy describes Matomo Analytics as a “self-hosted” solution operating without cookies and without collecting PII. Technically, track.analytics.services.gov.ie is government infrastructure (a .gov.ie domain), which fundamentally distinguishes it from third-party cloud services. Nevertheless, the request recorded in the HAR at +588 ms carries: a unique visitor identifier _id=d1fd37127747513b, a session identifier pv_id=7KN68K, a full uadata field carrying the browser (Chromium 148.0.7778.217, Edge 148.0.3967.96), platform (Windows 19.0.0), screen resolution (1536x864), timestamps, and network timing data. Taken together, these parameters form a technical fingerprint sufficient to track the visitor. The policy characterizes this as anonymous data — whether such fingerprinting data qualifies as “personal” under the GDPR remains a debatable question, but the transfer occurs before any consent from the user regardless.
Google Tag Manager — undocumented, without consent
At +505 ms, www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-Y9JG02MH13 loads. GTM is not mentioned anywhere in the privacy policy. This means data is transmitted to Google’s servers in the USA without documentation and without consent. The very body responsible for setting digital-architecture standards across the country’s entire civil service uses an American advertising tag container without disclosing this fact in its own policy.
Google Fonts without consent and without mention
At +506 ms — fonts.googleapis.com (Lato); at +537 ms — fonts.gstatic.com with a font file. The user’s IP address is transmitted to Google’s servers in the USA. Google Fonts is not mentioned in the privacy policy. The font could be hosted locally at assets.per.gov.ie, where every other static resource on the site is already hosted.
Set-Cookie — zero
None of the 19 requests sets a cookie via Set-Cookie. Cookies are also absent from outgoing requests. Matomo operates in cookieless mode — consistent with the declared policy. However, the absence of cookies does not mean the absence of data processing.
Conclusion
The OGCIO is the body that sets digital-policy standards for the entirety of Ireland’s civil service. Its own site runs GTM without documentation and without consent, Google Fonts without documentation, and activates Matomo tracking carrying a detailed fingerprint before any interaction with the banner. The privacy policy was updated on 29 April 2026 — shortly before the date of this audit — and does not reflect GTM’s presence. For a body that publishes guidance on GDPR-compliant development of government services, the gap between documentation and implementation carries significance extending well beyond a single website.
How to verify: download the file and compute its checksum — sha256sum file.har (Linux, macOS) or certutil -hashfile file.har SHA256 (Windows); it must match the one shown. The conclusions apply to the scope of this measurement — see the limitations of the method.
44e60154fecb4abc2a4d73c2f3186aabbe7fe684a0437788e010964bec10dac2Want a response from the company about this audit? → Open the tool
Fill in once — it will be inserted into every letter below:
All fields are required to print the document — this is a formal requirement of the letter itself (the particulars of an official submission), not data collection: nothing is sent or saved anywhere, it all stays in your browser and disappears when you close the page. See the methodology for details.
RIA DigiDoc — phone · Smart-ID / Mobile-ID
Send this letter directly to the company first — before contacting the regulator it has the right to respond (GDPR Art. 12(3) — 30 days).
Тема: Запрос доступа к персональным данным (ст. 15 GDPR) — ogcio.gov.ie Кому: [укажите адрес компании — DPO / поддержка / юридический отдел] От: [Ваше имя], [контактный email] Прошу предоставить доступ к моим персональным данным, обрабатываемым в связи с использованием сайта ogcio.gov.ie. 1. Категории данных и цели обработки (ст. 15(1)(a)-(c)) На основании независимого технического анализа сайта прошу подтвердить и подробно раскрыть следующие категории обработки: 1) Google Tag Manager (G-Y9JG02MH13) и Google Fonts загружаются на +505–506 мс без согласия. Matomo-трекер (track.analytics.services.gov.ie) отправляет полный fingerprint-запрос на +588 мс без согласия: браузер (Chromium 148, Edge 148), платформа (Windows 19.0.0), разрешение экрана (1536x864), уникальный идентификатор _id=d1fd37127747513b, идентификатор посещения pv_id=7KN68K. Политика заявляет cookieless tracking без PII — но запрос содержит детализированный технический fingerprint. 2) Политика описывает Matomo как cookieless-решение без PII и не упоминает Google Tag Manager. GTM (G-Y9JG02MH13) загружается параллельно с Matomo без согласия. Присутствие GTM в HAR не задокументировано в политике ни в каком виде. 3) Google Fonts (fonts.googleapis.com, fonts.gstatic.com) в политике не упомянуты. GTM и связанный GA4 ID не упомянуты. Три внешних получателя данных из четырёх не задокументированы. 2. Получатели, сроки хранения и передача за пределы ЕЭЗ (ст. 15(1)(c)-(d), 46) Прошу также указать полный список третьих лиц-получателей, применимые сроки хранения по каждой категории и правовые основания передачи данных за пределы ЕЭЗ, если таковая происходит. Полный технический разбор с доказательствами (сохранённый сетевой журнал, контрольная сумма SHA-256) опубликован по адресу: https://gdpru.eu/en/audits/ie-ogcio-gov-ie/ 3. Автоматизированная обработка и профилирование (ст. 15(1)(h)) Прошу сообщить, применяется ли в отношении меня автоматизированное принятие решений или профилирование, и если да — раскрыть логику такой обработки. С уважением, [Ваше имя] [контактный email] [Страна] [Дата]
Subject: Data access request (GDPR Art. 15) — ogcio.gov.ie To: [insert the company's address — DPO / support / legal department] From: [Your name], [contact email] I request access to my personal data processed in connection with the website ogcio.gov.ie. 1. Categories of data and purposes of processing (Art. 15(1)(a)-(c)) Based on an independent technical analysis of the site, I request confirmation and detailed disclosure of the following categories of processing: 1) Google Tag Manager (G-Y9JG02MH13) and Google Fonts load at +505–506 ms without consent. The Matomo tracker (track.analytics.services.gov.ie) sends a full fingerprinting request at +588 ms without consent: browser (Chromium 148, Edge 148), platform (Windows 19.0.0), screen resolution (1536x864), a unique identifier _id=d1fd37127747513b, and a visit identifier pv_id=7KN68K. The policy declares cookieless tracking with no PII — yet the request carries a detailed technical fingerprint. 2) The policy describes Matomo as a cookieless solution collecting no PII and does not mention Google Tag Manager. GTM (G-Y9JG02MH13) loads in parallel with Matomo without consent. GTM's presence in the HAR is not documented in the policy in any form. 3) Google Fonts (fonts.googleapis.com, fonts.gstatic.com) is not mentioned in the policy. GTM and its associated GA4 ID are not mentioned. Three of four external data recipients are undocumented. 2. Recipients, retention periods, and transfers outside the EEA (Art. 15(1)(c)-(d), 46) I also request the full list of third-party recipients, the applicable retention period for each category, and the legal basis for any transfer of data outside the EEA. The full technical audit with evidence (saved network log, SHA-256 checksum) is published at: https://gdpru.eu/en/audits/ie-ogcio-gov-ie/ 3. Automated processing and profiling (Art. 15(1)(h)) Please state whether I am subject to automated decision-making or profiling, and if so, disclose the logic involved. Sincerely, [Your name] [contact email] [Country] [Date]
RIA DigiDoc — phone · Smart-ID / Mobile-ID
Where to file: Data Protection Commission (DPC) — dataprotection.ie
The regulator reviews complaints in its national language. There is an officially translated template from the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) — you can use it instead of or alongside this letter: Official EDPB complaint form (PDF, your language)
Тема: Жалоба на обработку персональных данных — ogcio.gov.ie 1. Предмет жалобы Я подаю жалобу в отношении обработки моих персональных данных сайтом ogcio.gov.ie. 2. Обстоятельства Я посетил сайт ogcio.gov.ie и обнаружил признаки несоответствия обработки моих персональных данных требованиям GDPR. Технический разбор, опубликованный на gdpru.eu 31.05.2026 (открытая методология, воспроизводимые измерения), документирует следующие признаки: 1) Google Tag Manager (G-Y9JG02MH13) и Google Fonts загружаются на +505–506 мс без согласия. Matomo-трекер (track.analytics.services.gov.ie) отправляет полный fingerprint-запрос на +588 мс без согласия: браузер (Chromium 148, Edge 148), платформа (Windows 19.0.0), разрешение экрана (1536x864), уникальный идентификатор _id=d1fd37127747513b, идентификатор посещения pv_id=7KN68K. Политика заявляет cookieless tracking без PII — но запрос содержит детализированный технический fingerprint. 2) Политика описывает Matomo как cookieless-решение без PII и не упоминает Google Tag Manager. GTM (G-Y9JG02MH13) загружается параллельно с Matomo без согласия. Присутствие GTM в HAR не задокументировано в политике ни в каком виде. 3) Google Fonts (fonts.googleapis.com, fonts.gstatic.com) в политике не упомянуты. GTM и связанный GA4 ID не упомянуты. Три внешних получателя данных из четырёх не задокументированы. Полная техническая документация опубликована по адресу: https://gdpru.eu/en/audits/ie-ogcio-gov-ie/ 3. Положения GDPR, соблюдение которых прошу проверить GDPR Art. 6(1), Art. 7; ePrivacy Regulations (SI 336/2011); GDPR Art. 5(1)(a) — прозрачность; GDPR Art. 13(1)(e) 4. Требование Прошу проверить изложенные обстоятельства и, если несоответствие подтвердится, принять меры, предусмотренные статьёй 58(2) GDPR. 5. Приложения Полная доказательная база — HAR-файл, контрольная сумма SHA-256 и цитата из политики конфиденциальности сайта, документирующая указанное противоречие — опубликована и проверяема по ссылке в пункте 2 выше. С уважением, [Ваше имя] [контактный email] [Страна] [Дата]
Subject: Complaint regarding personal data processing — ogcio.gov.ie 1. Subject of the complaint I am filing a complaint regarding the processing of my personal data by the website ogcio.gov.ie. 2. Circumstances I visited the website ogcio.gov.ie and found indications that the processing of my personal data does not comply with the GDPR. The technical analysis published on gdpru.eu on 31 May 2026 (open methodology, reproducible measurements) documents the following indications: 1) Google Tag Manager (G-Y9JG02MH13) and Google Fonts load at +505–506 ms without consent. The Matomo tracker (track.analytics.services.gov.ie) sends a full fingerprinting request at +588 ms without consent: browser (Chromium 148, Edge 148), platform (Windows 19.0.0), screen resolution (1536x864), a unique identifier _id=d1fd37127747513b, and a visit identifier pv_id=7KN68K. The policy declares cookieless tracking with no PII — yet the request carries a detailed technical fingerprint. 2) The policy describes Matomo as a cookieless solution collecting no PII and does not mention Google Tag Manager. GTM (G-Y9JG02MH13) loads in parallel with Matomo without consent. GTM's presence in the HAR is not documented in the policy in any form. 3) Google Fonts (fonts.googleapis.com, fonts.gstatic.com) is not mentioned in the policy. GTM and its associated GA4 ID are not mentioned. Three of four external data recipients are undocumented. Full technical documentation is published at: https://gdpru.eu/en/audits/ie-ogcio-gov-ie/ 3. GDPR provisions I ask you to examine GDPR Art. 6(1), Art. 7; ePrivacy Regulations (SI 336/2011); GDPR Art. 5(1)(a) — transparency; GDPR Art. 13(1)(e) 4. Request I request that you examine the circumstances described and, if non-compliance is confirmed, apply the measures provided for in Article 58(2) GDPR. 5. Attachments The full evidence base — the HAR file, its SHA-256 checksum and the quotation from the site's privacy policy documenting the stated contradiction — is published and verifiable at the link in point 2 above. Sincerely, [Your name] [contact email] [Country] [Date]