Policy changed — see what exactly · 2026-08-14 →
The Hungarian Public Media Fund (MTVA) — 163 requests, 17 domains. An InMobi consent management platform (IAB TCF) is present, but advertising does not wait for it: Google Ad Manager, the Facebook SDK, and prebid wrappers load before and around the banner. Meanwhile, MTVA's official policy states directly that data is not transferred to third parties.
Timeline of the leak
Declared versus actual
Transfer timings
Prebid from the Hungarian advertising network atmedia.
Google Ad Manager (GPT). Google, USA. Before the CMP.
Facebook SDK. Meta, USA.
InMobi CMP (IAB TCF). The consent banner.
Detected trackers
- Google Ad Manager / GPT (securepubads.g.doubleclick.net) — advertising tag prior to the banner
- Google Tag Manager (GTM-T7Z89BJ)
- Facebook / Meta (connect.facebook.net, static.xx.fbcdn.net, share buttons) — SDK prior to consent
- InMobi CMP (cmp.inmobi.com) — IAB TCF consent management platform
- atmedia (cdn.atmedia.hu) — Hungarian advertising network, prebid
- Publisher1st (cdn.publisher1st.com) — prebid header bidding
- Google+ platform (apis.google.com), Google Fonts
Indicators of GDPR non-compliance
- GDPR Art. 6 + ePrivacy (Hungarian implementation) — advertising and social trackers prior to consentOn page load, before and in parallel with the appearance of the InMobi consent management platform (cmp.inmobi.com at +645 ms), advertising and social services fire: prebid wrappers from atmedia and Publisher1st (at +498–500 ms), the Google Ad Manager advertising tag (securepubads.g.doubleclick.net/tag/js/gpt.js at +604 ms), and the Facebook SDK (connect.facebook.net at +608 ms). The InMobi consent management platform appears after them. No cookies are set in the captured headers (Set-Cookie is zero); no choice has been made by the user.
- GDPR Art. 13(1)(e) + Chapter V — disclosure of recipients and cross-border transfer, contradiction with the policyMTVA's official policy states directly that personal data is not transferred to third parties, except in legally required cases. The capture, however, shows full-scale advertising monetization: prior to consent, the visitor's IP address is transmitted to advertising recipients in the USA (Google — Ad Manager, Tag Manager; Meta/Facebook) and to advertising networks (atmedia, Publisher1st). This directly contradicts the policy's statement that data is not transferred to third parties.
Context
mtva.hu is the website of the Media Support and Asset Management Fund (Médiaszolgáltatás-támogató és Vagyonkezelő Alap, MTVA), the state body that funds and supports content production for Hungarian public broadcasting. The data controller is MTVA. Capture: 163 requests, 17 domains, recorded in a clean browser.
Direct Recipients of Data (prior to consent)
Google (USA) — Ad Manager (GPT), Tag Manager, the Google+ platform, Fonts. Meta/Facebook (USA) — SDK and share buttons. atmedia, Publisher1st — prebid advertising wrappers.
Declared versus Actual
Here the discrepancy is especially stark. MTVA’s official policy (in its legal and privacy notice section) states directly: personal data is not transferred to third parties, except in legally required cases — contractual obligations, judicial, prosecutorial, supervisory, and other lawful procedures. The policy says nothing about advertising monetization or advertising partners.
The capture reveals the opposite. The site runs a full-scale advertising machine, and does so before the consent management platform even appears. At +498–500 ms, prebid wrappers from the Hungarian advertising networks atmedia (cdn.atmedia.hu) and Publisher1st (cdn.publisher1st.com) connect. At +604 ms, the Google Ad Manager advertising tag starts (securepubads.g.doubleclick.net/tag/js/gpt.js), and at +608 ms, the Facebook SDK (connect.facebook.net). Only at +645 ms does the InMobi consent management platform itself load (cmp.inmobi.com/choice), built on the IAB TCF standard. That is, the Google advertising tag, the Facebook SDK, and prebid execute before the visitor even sees the consent banner.
Subsequently, at +2160 ms, Google Tag Manager loads, and at +2190–2615 ms, Facebook social share buttons (www.facebook.com/plugins/share_button.php, static.xx.fbcdn.net). Additionally, at +226 ms, the Google+ platform (apis.google.com) and Google Fonts connect. No cookies are set in the captured headers (Set-Cookie is zero), but the absence of cookies does not negate the transfer of the IP address to advertising and social recipients that has already taken place. Thus, the policy’s statement that data is not transferred to third parties directly contradicts the site’s actual advertising monetization.
Timing Relative to Consent
Prebid fires at +498 ms, Google Ad Manager at +604 ms, the Facebook SDK at +608 ms, the InMobi banner at +645 ms, and GTM plus the share buttons at +2160–2615 ms. Advertising and social modules precede the consent banner. No consent was given during the session (Set-Cookie is zero).
What Cannot Be Asserted from This Capture
The capture covers the home page in its pre-consent state. Set-Cookie is absent from the captured headers; the conclusion is drawn from the fact of script loading (GPT, the Facebook SDK, prebid, GTM), rather than from cookie headers. Behavior following a click on “accept” or “reject” in the InMobi banner is not observed in this session. Google and Meta may use edge nodes within the EU; the conclusion drawn therefore concerns the recipients’ corporate affiliation (US companies), not the physical location of the nodes. Server-side processing is not visible in a browser-based capture.
Conclusion
The website of Hungary’s public media fund is equipped with an InMobi consent management platform, but advertising and social modules do not wait for it: Google Ad Manager, the Facebook SDK, and prebid wrappers start before the banner, transmitting the visitor’s IP address to advertising recipients in the USA and to advertising networks. It is particularly significant that MTVA’s official policy states directly the opposite — that personal data is not transferred to third parties. The discrepancy between what is declared and what actually occurs here is fundamental: the policy denies any data transfer, while the site runs full-scale advertising monetization prior to consent. For a state body responsible for public broadcasting, this constitutes a violation of the requirements concerning the legal basis for processing, disclosure of recipients, and cross-border transfer. Remedy: link advertising and social tags to the consent management platform and hold them back until actual consent is given, and bring the policy into line with the actual set of data recipients.
ab09b78b5a39b041a0187b904ef76ce007735fa0d1f7a47205ce91e62f4ab53dWhere to file: Hungarian National Authority for Data Protection (NAIH) — file a complaint online →
To: Hungarian National Authority for Data Protection (NAIH) From: [Your name], [contact email] 1. Subject of the complaint I am filing a complaint regarding the processing of my personal data by the website mtva.hu. 2. Circumstances I visited the website mtva.hu and found indications that the processing of my personal data does not comply with the GDPR. The technical analysis published on gdpru.eu on 29 May 2026 (open methodology, reproducible measurements) documents the following indications: 1) On page load, before and in parallel with the appearance of the InMobi consent management platform (cmp.inmobi.com at +645 ms), advertising and social services fire: prebid wrappers from atmedia and Publisher1st (at +498–500 ms), the Google Ad Manager advertising tag (securepubads.g.doubleclick.net/tag/js/gpt.js at +604 ms), and the Facebook SDK (connect.facebook.net at +608 ms). The InMobi consent management platform appears after them. No cookies are set in the captured headers (Set-Cookie is zero); no choice has been made by the user. 2) MTVA's official policy states directly that personal data is not transferred to third parties, except in legally required cases. The capture, however, shows full-scale advertising monetization: prior to consent, the visitor's IP address is transmitted to advertising recipients in the USA (Google — Ad Manager, Tag Manager; Meta/Facebook) and to advertising networks (atmedia, Publisher1st). This directly contradicts the policy's statement that data is not transferred to third parties. Full technical documentation is published at: https://gdpru.eu/en/audits/hu-mtva-hu/ 3. Provisions violated GDPR Art. 6 + ePrivacy (Hungarian implementation) — advertising and social trackers prior to consent; GDPR Art. 13(1)(e) + Chapter V — disclosure of recipients and cross-border transfer, contradiction with the policy 4. Request I request that you investigate the violations described and apply the measures provided for in Article 58(2) GDPR. 5. Attachments The full evidence base — the HAR file, its SHA-256 checksum and the quotation from the site's privacy policy documenting the stated contradiction — is published and verifiable at the link in point 2 above. [Date] [Signature / name]