euaa.europa.eu
Policy changed — see what exactly · 2026-08-14 →
The EU's asylum agency — 175 requests, 5 domains. Flourish transmits data to the USA with no consent. YouTube is embedded via webtools CRS — the European Commission's delayed-consent mechanism. A weak CSP.
Timeline of the leak
Declared versus actual
Transfer timings
Flourish fonts. USA
YouTube via the EC's consent mechanism
Detected trackers
- Flourish (public.flourish.studio)
Indicators of GDPR non-compliance
- Regulation 2018/1725 Art. 5Flourish (+1456 ms) loads with no consent — fonts and CSS from public.flourish.studio. Visitors' IP addresses go to Flourish's American infrastructure.
Context
The European Union Agency for Asylum (EUAA) coordinates the asylum systems of EU member states. It processes sensitive data on refugees and asylum seekers. Governed by Regulation (EU) 2018/1725. HAR: 175 requests, 5 domains. The session covered three pages.
webtools CRS — the right approach to YouTube
When a HAR records YouTube, it usually means a direct load with no consent. EUAA uses a different mechanism: europa.eu/webtools/crs/iframe?oriurl=youtube.com/embed/.... CRS — the Content Rendering Service — is a European Commission tool that intercepts embedding of external content and shows the user a consent prompt before YouTube loads. This is the correct architecture — the same principle as youtube-nocookie with lazy loading, but implemented centrally via webtools.
Flourish — the same problem seen at EBA
public.flourish.studio (+1456 ms) loads fonts for embedded visualizations — Open Sans Bold and Regular. As with EBA, Flourish transmits visitors’ IP addresses to American infrastructure with no consent. Datawrapper (a German, DSGVO-compliant platform) or a self-hosted solution would replace Flourish.
A weak CSP
Content-Security-Policy: report-uri /report-csp-violation — the policy contains only a report-uri directive, with no actual restrictions. This means the CSP is configured in violation-logging mode without any real blocking. In effect, the CSP does not function as protection.
Sensitivity context
EUAA coordinates the processing of data on refugees and asylum seekers — one of the most vulnerable groups. Information about who visits an asylum agency’s website can be sensitive in itself. Flourish, with no consent, transmits information about every visit to the USA.
Conclusion
EUAA uses webtools CRS for YouTube — the correct architectural choice, worth noting. Flourish with no consent and the absence of a functioning CSP are the two issues. Self-hosting Flourish’s fonts, or replacing it with a European visualization platform, would resolve the first.
b2809e980a47f166832d7e94e0dc067d6c4b2d90c1760d2eff1dddb48c73cf60Where to file: European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) — edps.europa.eu
To: European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) From: [Your name], [contact email] 1. Subject of the complaint I am filing a complaint regarding the processing of my personal data by the website euaa.europa.eu. 2. Circumstances I visited the website euaa.europa.eu and found indications that the processing of my personal data does not comply with the GDPR. The technical analysis published on gdpru.eu on 13 May 2026 (open methodology, reproducible measurements) documents the following indications: 1) Flourish (+1456 ms) loads with no consent — fonts and CSS from public.flourish.studio. Visitors' IP addresses go to Flourish's American infrastructure. Full technical documentation is published at: https://gdpru.eu/en/audits/eu-euaa-europa-eu/ 3. Provisions violated Regulation 2018/1725 Art. 5 4. Request I request that you investigate the violations described and apply the measures provided for in Article 58(2) GDPR. 5. Attachments The full evidence base — the HAR file, its SHA-256 checksum and the quotation from the site's privacy policy documenting the stated contradiction — is published and verifiable at the link in point 2 above. [Date] [Signature / name]