Austria's Federal Statistical Office — 27 requests, 1 domain. Zero external requests. Matomo and Google reCAPTCHA are declared in the policy — neither appeared in the HAR. The CSP permits Google, but Google stays silent.
Timeline of the leak
Declared versus actual
Indicators of GDPR non-compliance
- GDPR Art. 6(1)(a), TKG § 165Matomo is declared in the privacy policy without a stated legal basis. No consent gate is traceable in the HAR: SgCookieOptin loads, but Matomo did not appear in the session — possibly inactive on the current page or blocked by settings.
- GDPR Art. 13Google reCAPTCHA is declared on the basis of Art. 6(1)(f) — legitimate interest. It did not appear in the HAR, but the CSP allows *.google.com and *.gstatic.com. No legal basis for the data transfer to the USA is stated.
Context
Statistik Austria (Bundesanstalt Statistik Österreich) is the federal statistical office, a public-law institution. HAR: 27 requests, 1 domain. The privacy policy is in English, last updated January 2026.
One domain, zero external
27 requests — all to www.statistik.at. Source Sans 3 fonts, icons, jQuery — all local. Zero cookies, zero external requests. The CSP allows *.google.com, *.gstatic.com, and *.highcharts.com — but none of them appeared in the HAR.
Matomo and reCAPTCHA — in the policy, not in the HAR
The policy mentions Matomo for “statistical analysis of access” — with no legal basis and no mention of a consent gate. SgCookieOptin (a TYPO3 plugin) loads, but Matomo was not activated on this page. Google reCAPTCHA is declared on the basis of legitimate interest (Art. 6(1)(f)) — absent from the HAR, likely used only on pages with forms.
Conclusion
In practice, this is a clean HAR — one domain, zero trackers. The policy describes tools that were not activated during this session. The weak point: Matomo is declared without a stated legal basis, which creates a gap for when it is actually activated.
d3430b1e0a2480238817afde40a532cc995bd71ba76d4f90f21df8e0929ec8a0Where to file: Datenschutzbehörde (DSB) — file a complaint online →
To: Datenschutzbehörde (DSB) From: [Your name], [contact email] 1. Subject of the complaint I am filing a complaint regarding the processing of my personal data by the website statistik.at. 2. Circumstances I visited the website statistik.at and found indications that the processing of my personal data does not comply with the GDPR. The technical analysis published on gdpru.eu on 26 May 2026 (open methodology, reproducible measurements) documents the following indications: 1) Matomo is declared in the privacy policy without a stated legal basis. No consent gate is traceable in the HAR: SgCookieOptin loads, but Matomo did not appear in the session — possibly inactive on the current page or blocked by settings. 2) Google reCAPTCHA is declared on the basis of Art. 6(1)(f) — legitimate interest. It did not appear in the HAR, but the CSP allows *.google.com and *.gstatic.com. No legal basis for the data transfer to the USA is stated. Full technical documentation is published at: https://gdpru.eu/en/audits/at-statistik-at/ 3. Provisions violated GDPR Art. 6(1)(a), TKG § 165; GDPR Art. 13 4. Request I request that you investigate the violations described and apply the measures provided for in Article 58(2) GDPR. 5. Attachments The full evidence base — the HAR file, its SHA-256 checksum and the quotation from the site's privacy policy documenting the stated contradiction — is published and verifiable at the link in point 2 above. [Date] [Signature / name]