Federal Ministry of Justice — 39 requests, 3 domains. Siteimprove Analytics loads without consent at +2671 ms. Matomo is declared — absent from the HAR. The policy names both tools, but there is no consent mechanism.
Timeline of the leak
Declared versus actual
Transfer timings
Cookieless tracking based on a Visitor Hash. Data on servers in Denmark.
Detected trackers
- Siteimprove Analytics
Indicators of GDPR non-compliance
- GDPR Art. 6(1)(a), TKG § 165Siteimprove Analytics loads 2671 ms after the page opens — without a consent banner and without consent. The privacy policy declares Siteimprove but does not state a legal basis and does not provide for opt-in.
Context
Bundesministerium für Justiz (BMJ) is the federal ministry of justice, overseeing the judicial system and the prison service. HAR: 39 requests, 3 domains. The same BRZ platform, Magnolia CMS.
Siteimprove without consent
Siteimprove is declared in the policy — that’s a plus. But it loads at +2671 ms without any consent banner. The policy describes cookies and analytics without stating a legal basis and without providing for opt-in. Matomo is also declared, but did not appear in the HAR — possibly because a consent gate is configured for it but not for Siteimprove.
Notable context
bmj.gv.at is the ministry responsible for justiz.gv.at (the judicial system portal). justiz.gv.at showed a clean HAR. bmj.gv.at — the ministry’s own site — uses Siteimprove without consent. Different architectural choices within the same ministry.
Conclusion
The Ministry of Justice declares its analytics — and that’s correct. But Siteimprove runs before consent. The same pattern seen at the Sozialministerium and bildung.gv.at — Siteimprove on Austrian government sites consistently fires without a consent gate.
ce2ac29d2c76d74fe8820301a3780b39c7dc758840d7b6a93fa66a573ee84305Where to file: Datenschutzbehörde (DSB) — file a complaint online →
To: Datenschutzbehörde (DSB) From: [Your name], [contact email] 1. Subject of the complaint I am filing a complaint regarding the processing of my personal data by the website bmj.gv.at. 2. Circumstances I visited the website bmj.gv.at and found indications that the processing of my personal data does not comply with the GDPR. The technical analysis published on gdpru.eu on 26 May 2026 (open methodology, reproducible measurements) documents the following indications: 1) Siteimprove Analytics loads 2671 ms after the page opens — without a consent banner and without consent. The privacy policy declares Siteimprove but does not state a legal basis and does not provide for opt-in. Full technical documentation is published at: https://gdpru.eu/en/audits/at-bmj-gv-at/ 3. Provisions violated GDPR Art. 6(1)(a), TKG § 165 4. Request I request that you investigate the violations described and apply the measures provided for in Article 58(2) GDPR. 5. Attachments The full evidence base — the HAR file, its SHA-256 checksum and the quotation from the site's privacy policy documenting the stated contradiction — is published and verifiable at the link in point 2 above. [Date] [Signature / name]