App analysis · 20.10.2026
Bitmask
se.leap.bitmaskclient · version 1.6.3
In short
SDKs found: 0. Companies: 0, of which outside the EEA — 0. Sensitive permissions: 3 — all code inside the app, including embedded SDKs, can use them.
Sensitive permissions (3)
- camera —
android.permission.CAMERA - write files on the device —
android.permission.WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE - list of all installed apps —
android.permission.QUERY_ALL_PACKAGES
All manifest permissions (14)
android.permission.ACCESS_NETWORK_STATEandroid.permission.ACCESS_WIFI_STATEandroid.permission.CAMERAandroid.permission.FOREGROUND_SERVICEandroid.permission.FOREGROUND_SERVICE_DATA_SYNCandroid.permission.FOREGROUND_SERVICE_SYSTEM_EXEMPTEDandroid.permission.INTERNETandroid.permission.POST_NOTIFICATIONSandroid.permission.QUERY_ALL_PACKAGESandroid.permission.RECEIVE_BOOT_COMPLETEDandroid.permission.VIBRATEandroid.permission.WAKE_LOCKandroid.permission.WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGEse.leap.bitmaskclient.DYNAMIC_RECEIVER_NOT_EXPORTED_PERMISSION
Limits of the analysis
The analysis shows code inside the app file, not data transfers: an SDK being present means a transfer is possible, not that it happens. The country is where the company owning the SDK is registered, not where its servers are. Some code may have been renamed at build time, so the SDK list is a lower bound.
The legal assessment is made by the competent supervisory authority.
Evidence
se.leap.bitmaskclient · version 1.6.3 (code 186000)9678ecd476f9ea34f0b9185948741c266d8d4193a43f4903b16ff7daabfdb7b6164269d3eec96947c92cf9797b765f73faf2d1822e6db41f1b3dab2914dc8bc0The same file (same SHA-256) with the same library version gives the same result — check it on the APK check page. Licence CC BY 4.0, source — gdpru.eu; report errors to contact@gdpru.eu.